Outline
Figures

Volume: 01, Issue: 01, Page: 15-20

Evaluation of the yield performance of freshwater prawns (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) cultured in a biofloc system at various densities

1 Department of Fisheries Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Fisheries, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur-5200, Bangladesh

2 Rural Development Academy, Bogura-5842, Bangladesh

*Corresponding authors Email address: ashraful.fbg@hstu.ac.bd (Md. Ashraful Alam)

doi: https://doi.org/10.69517/jars.2024.01.01.0004

Share:

Received:
02 July 2024

Revised:
07 August 2024

Accepted:
18 August 2024

Published:
09 September 2024

Highlights

  • Optimal prawn density was 50 prawns/m² maximizes growth and survival rates.
  • Lower density boosts growth of freshwater prawn in tank based biofloc culture
  • Best FCR observed in lower density
  • Highest plankton abundance in T-3 with 19.9×10⁴ cells/L.

Abstract

Biofloc technology is beneficial for prawn farming because it saves resources, protects the environment, and uses less energy. This study was conducted to evaluate the yield performance of freshwater prawns (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) cultured in a biofloc system at various densities (T-1 = 50 prawn/m², T-2 = 70 prawn/m², and T-3 = 90 prawn/m²). The experiment, which was conducted over 180 days with three replications, utilized rectangular aquaria with a water volume of 100 liters. Before stocking, post-larvae (12 days old) were nursed in a mother tank for 40 days. Throughout the experiment, water quality parameters, such as temperature, dissolved oxygen, and pH, were monitored daily. Total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) was measured three times a week, whereas nitrite (NO2), alkalinity, and hardness levels were assessed weekly. After the experiment, we evaluated growth performance metrics, including weight gain, specific growth rate (SGR), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and survival rate. The plankton densities in the experimental units were also observed. Except for alkalinity, all water quality variables remained within the optimal range. The maximum weight gain, SGR (%), efficient FCR, and survival (%) were 35.35±8.54, 2.04±0.08, 1.91±0.10, and 74.00±9.57, respectively, in T-1. In contrast, the highest planktonic density (46.8×104 cells/L) was found in T-3. Finally, the results suggest that a stocking density of 50 prawns/m2 yielded better results in a zero water exchange biofloc culture tank and can enhance prawn culture in the farmer’s field.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Planktonic density, Water quality, Growth performance, Post-larvae, Mother tank

1. Introduction

Macrobrachium rosenbergii, commonly known as the freshwater prawn, has commercial importance and export potential in Bangladesh and worldwide as well. M. rosenbergii plays a crucial role in earning foreign currency for the country (Barua and Das, 2018 popup link icon). Global freshwater prawn production, dominated by M. rosenbergii, reached approximately 500,000 tons in 2016 according to FAO, (2016 popup link icon). In contrast, Bangladesh's shrimp and prawn aquaculture yielded 287.5 thousand metric tons in 2022, as reported by the Department of Fisheries (Azad and Azad, 2022 popup link icon). The success of prawn aquaculture depends on various factors, including stocking density, which affects the growth performance and overall productivity of cultivated prawns (López‐Huerta et al., 2021 popup link icon). Biofloc technology (BFT) is considered a promising approach in aquaculture because it provides sustainable and environmentally conscious solutions for optimal production and water quality (Ogello et al., 2021 popup link icon). BFTs use beneficial microbial organisms such as bacteria, algae, and other microorganisms to convert organic waste into bioflocs, which serve as good sources of feed for cultured fish (Mugwanya et al., 2021 popup link icon). Biofloc technology in aquaculture involves the cultivation of advantageous microorganisms to increase water quality and provide supplementary nutrition for aquatic animals, thereby increasing sustainability and efficiency (Crab et al., 2012 popup link icon; Bossier and Ekasari, 2017 popup link icon).
This system effectively mitigates the need for water exchange and external feed inputs, fostering environmentally conscious farming practices (Emerenciano et al., 2017 popup link icon; Mugwanya et al., 2021 popup link icon). Biofloc systems have shown promise in improving water quality, nutrient uptake, and growth performance in different aquatic species (Huang et al., 2022 popup link icon). To maximize the benefits of biofloc technology in freshwater prawn production, it is vital to optimize stocking densities that promote growth and reduce stress (Khanjani and Sharifinia, 2022 popup link icon). Stocking density directly affects available space, feed competition, and interactions among prawns, all of which significantly influence their growth and survival rates (Ali et al., 2020 popup link icon). Optimizing stocking densities is crucial not only for enhancing growth performance but also for ensuring the economic viability of aquaculture operations (Ronald et al., 2014 popup link icon). Overcrowding can lead to increased resource competition, elevated stress levels, and increased vulnerability to diseases, ultimately reducing overall productivity and profitability in prawn farming (Nath and Haldar, 2020 popup link icon). Conversely, understocking can result in the underutilization of available resources and infrastructure, leading to suboptimal production outcomes (Tidwell, 2012 popup link icon). Freshwater prawn cultivation usually takes place in earthen ponds via a semi-intensive method involving fertilization and supplemental feeding (New, 2005 popup link icon).
These ponds are stocked with post-larvae or juvenile prawns at densities ranging from 4 to 20 individuals per square meter (Marques et al., 2010 popup link icon). In Bangladesh, prawn farming is performed mainly in semi-intensive systems within coastal areas (Ahmed et al., 2008 popup link icon). However, the optimal stocking densities for rearing M. rosenbergii in highly intensive biofloc systems in Bangladesh are still unknown. Therefore, determining the appropriate stocking density requires careful consideration of multiple factors, including the definite characteristics of the biofloc system, the biological needs of the prawns, and the economic goals of the aquaculture operation. Several studies have examined the impact of population densities of shrimp and freshwater prawn production in biofloc systems. These studies have provided valuable insights into the relationship between stocking density and the growth performance of these organisms. For example, Irani et al. (2023 popup link icon) reported that moderate stocking density (40 prawn/m2) had the best growth rate and survival for M. rosenbergii in biofloc systems. In parallel, Hwihy et al. (2021 popup link icon) reported that higher stocking densities led to decreased growth rates and increased stress levels for Litopenaeus vannamei in biofloc systems. Negrini et al. (2017 popup link icon) reported that optimizing stocking densities is crucial for achieving optimal growth performance and maintaining the health of Penaeus monodon in biofloc systems.
Despite the knowledge generated by these studies, the impact of stocking density on the growth performance of freshwater prawns in biofloc systems has not been studied in Bangladesh. Understanding the optimal stocking densities for M. rosenbergii in a biofloc environment can help farmers and aquaculture professionals make informed decisions to increase the productivity and sustainability of their operations. To fill this knowledge gap, this study aimed to assess the effects of different stocking densities on the growth parameters of M. rosenbergii in a biofloc system without water exchange along with water quality and plankton density.


2. Materials and Methods

2.1 Ethical approval

No ethical approval is required for this study.

2.2 Experimental site and duration

The experiment was conducted at the fish wet laboratory of the Rural Development Academy (RDA), Bogura, Bangladesh, from January 2021 to July 2021 (Figure 1).


Figure 1. Map of the study area.
Figure 1. Map of the study area.

2.3 Experimental conditions

Nine rectangular aquaria, each with a water capacity of 100 liters, were utilized for this purpose. To promote the development of natural biota, two plastic screens were attached horizontally to the bottom and vertically to the sides of each aquarium. These screens served as substrates and provided additional feed for the prawns, aided in nitrification, ensured a more uniform distribution of the prawns, and reduced their relative density (Ballester et al., 2017 popup link icon). Nets were placed over all the aquaria to prevent the prawns from escaping. Forty days prior to the inception of the experiment, a separate tank was filled with clear water. Subsequently, 50 liters of microorganism-rich water (green water) was added to the external tanks. This tank, known as the mother tank (Avnimelech, 1999 popup link icon), housed 1000 prawns, resulting in a stocking density of 230 prawns/m². The purpose of this tank was to support and facilitate the development of biofloc. Furthermore, 7.5 g of probiotics (Pondcare 35, 35 billion CFU/gram, Eskayef Pharmaceuticals LTD.) was added to the mother tanks daily. The probiotics were allowed to mature for eight hours before being used in the mother tank in another container with 10 L of water. Six pieces of air stone were provided in the mother’s tank. On the other hand, a single air stone was provided in each experimental aquarium from two aerators with backup for 24 hours throughout the experiment to increase the biofloculation rate.


2.4 Stocking densities and management system

Prawn post larvae (PLs) after 12 days were collected from the government fish production hatchery, Mithapukur, Rangpur, Bangladesh. The PLs were then reared in the mother tank for up to 40 days with no water exchanged, following Liu et al. (2017 popup link icon). Molasses was added as a carbon source in the mother tank when the total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) concentration was raised above one (1.0) ppm. For each (1.0) ppm increase in TAN in the tank, 6.0 g of carbon was added during the nursery period (40 days) (Ebeling et al., 2006 popup link icon). After the nursery period, prawns of similar size and weight were sorted from the mother tank to be stored in the experimental glass aquaria. The experiment was carried out under three treatments (T-1=50 prawn m-2, T-2= 70 prawn m-2 and T-3= 90 prawn m-2), with three replications for 180 days, as described by Negrini et al. (2017 popup link icon).


2.5 Feeding

The post-larvae of prawns were provided with a commercial diet containing 40% crude protein, which was fed three times daily. Initially, prawns were provided with food equivalent to 7% of their biomass. Feeding was offered at 8:00 am, with 30% of the daily amount given, followed by another 30% at 13:30 pm and the remainder at 17:30 pm. The daily feeding rate was adjusted to ensure complete consumption, and feed quantities were recorded to calculate feed utilization parameters. Additionally, pre-weighed molasses was added daily at 15:30 pm to maintain an optimal C/N ratio. Kaldnes biomedia (K2) media was also introduced into the nitrifying bacterial habitat to enhance the nitrification process.


2.6 Water quality monitoring

Daily measurements were taken for temperature, dissolved oxygen, and pH in each experimental unit via a multi-parameter device (model: HI 98194, HANNA, Romania). Total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) levels were assessed thrice weekly, whereas nitrite (NO2), alkalinity, and hardness were monitored weekly via the procedures outlined by Gunther et al. (1981 popup link icon). To maintain the water hardness above 20 mg/L, calcium carbonate was periodically added at a concentration of 0.5 g/L to the experimental units, as recommended by Arana (2010 popup link icon).


2.7 Determination of growth performance

After the experiment, we counted the remaining prawns in each experimental unit to determine the survival rate. Additionally, we used an analytical digital scale (accurate to 0.01 g) to measure the total individual weight of the prawns in each experimental unit. This measurement was then used to calculate the weight gain (WG), specific growth rate (SGR), and feed conversion rate (FCR).
formula jars 0004


2.8 Determination of planktonic microorganisms present in the floc

To determine the abundance of plankton, water samples were collected at the end of the experiment from each treatment and preserved in a 4% buffered formalin solution (Thompson et al., 2002 popup link icon). During each sampling, ten liters of water were taken from the experimental unit and passed through a 25 µm mesh plankton net for filtration. A dropper was used to transfer one ml of the concentrated plankton sample to the Sedgwick-Rafter (S-R) counting cell, which has a total volume of 1000 mm³ or 1 ml. The S-R cell was divided into 1000 fields, each with a volume of 0.001 ml. Before counting, the S-R cells were left undisturbed for at least 15 minutes to allow the plankton to settle. Next, the cell was placed on a camera microscope with phase contrast (Edler and Elbrächter, 2010 popup link icon). Planktonic organisms in 10 randomly selected fields out of the 1000 fields were then counted. The abundance of plankton was subsequently calculated via the formula provided by Rahman (1992 popup link icon).
formula jars 0004 2
N represents the number of plankton cells per liter, A denotes the total number of plankton counted, C is the volume of the final concentrate of samples in milliliters, V represents the volume of a field in cubic millimeters, F denotes the number of fields counted, and L is the volume of original water in liters.
The average plankton count was quantified as the number of cells per liter of water (cells/L). Planktonic images were captured and analyzed via IMAGEJ software, version 1.47, on the basis of the morphological characteristics of a digital microscope with a camera (Model: B-290TB, OPTIKA Italy).


2.9 Statistical analysis

The water quality data and growth parameters were subjected to repeated-measures ANOVA to assess significant differences at the 5% significance level (α=0.05). Post hoc analysis with the Tukey test (P<0.05) was conducted where significant differences were identified. Statistical analyses were carried out via IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 25.0.

3. Results and Discussion

Water quality parameters

During the experimental period, all the water quality parameters except alkalinity were within the optimum range. The water quality parameters are tabulated in Table 1. Alkalinity frequently fluctuated throughout the entire experimental period, indicating a loss of buffering capacity in the biofloc systems. As a result, frequent additions of NaHCO3 are required (Azim and Little, 2008 popup link icon). In biofloc farming systems, alkalinity and pH naturally tend to decrease, whereas nitrogen compound concentrations tend to increase (Wasielesky et al., 2006 popup link icon). Any deviations in water quality parameters from the optimum range were addressed by supplementing necessary aqua products or increasing aeration (Ebeling et al., 2006 popup link icon).


Table 1. Observed water quality parameters during the experiment.


3.2 Growth performance of freshwater prawns

The growth performance of freshwater prawns (M. rosenbergii) in a biofloc system was evaluated during the experimental period. The prawns in T-1 presented the greatest weight gain (35.35±8.541), although the difference was not statistically significant. In T-2 and T-3, the weight gain was 28.18±5.19 and 26.58±7.61, respectively (Table 2).
The SGR values were 2.04±0.08, 1.94±0.06, and 1.90±0.06 for the three treatments, respectively. In contrast, the lowest FCR at the end of the experiment was 1.91±0.104 in T-1, whereas T-2 and T-3 presented FCR values of 1.96±0.20 and 2.15±0.27, respectively. However, there was no statistically significant variation in weight gain, SGR, or FCR among the treatments. T-1 presented the highest survival rate (74.00±9.57), which significantly differed (P<0.05) from those of T-2 and T-3 (Table 2).


Table 2. Growth parameters in the three different treatment groups (means ± SD).


In this experiment, a lower stocking density resulted in greater growth performance. Several researchers have noted that M. rosenbergii has higher production and survival rates when it is stored at lower densities in experimental tanks (David et al., 2015 popup link icon; El-Sherif and Mervat, 2009 popup link icon; Paul et al., 2016 popup link icon). When freshwater prawns are stocked at high densities in different farming systems, they compete for food and space, leading to hierarchical competition and increased cannibalism (Moraes-Valenti et al., 2010 popup link icon; Arnold et al., 2006 popup link icon; Sampaio and Valenti, 1996 popup link icon). In this study, a relatively high stocking density did not significantly affect weight gain, SGR, or FCR. However, a relatively low stocking density significantly influenced the survival rate of M. rosenbergii. Under crowded conditions, intraspecific competition among freshwater prawns prompts a strategy to reduce the population size rather than affecting the growth parameters (Begon et al., 2007 popup link icon). Furthermore, the lower density (T-1) in the present study resulted in a more efficient FCR. As the stocking density of freshwater prawns increases, the efficiency of FCR decreases (Paul et al., 2016 popup link icon; El-Sherif and Mervat, 2009 popup link icon), which may be attributed to cannibalistic activities and growth differences between male and female freshwater prawns (Pérez-Rostro et al., 2014 popup link icon).


3.3 Total abundance of plankton present in the floc

The total abundance of plankton in T-3 was 19.9×104 cells/L, which was greater than that in the other two treatments. In T-1 and T-2, the abundances of plankton were 10.61×104 and 16.4×104 cells/L, respectively (Figure 2), and the microscopic views of the plankton densities and major individual plankton are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4, respectively.

Figure 2. Plankton densities (~×104) in the three different treatment groups on the final day of the experiments
Figure 2. Plankton densities (~×104) in the three different treatment groups on the final day of the experiments

Among the three treatments, a total of eleven plankton genera were found, of which eight were phytoplankton and three were zooplankton. The eight phytoplankton genera were categorized into three major groups: Cyanophyceae, Bacillariophyceae, and Chlorophyceae. The Cyanophyceae group consisted of Microcystis, Radiocystis, Merismopedia, and Ocillotaria.

Figure 3. Microscopic view of flocs at 10×0.25 magnification in three different treatment groups (captured with a digital microscope with a camera).
Figure 3. Microscopic view of flocs at 10×0.25 magnification in three different treatment groups (captured with a digital microscope with a camera).

The Bacillariophyceae group consisted of one genus, Tabellaria, whereas the Chlorophyceae group consisted of Coelastrum, Microspora, and Chlorella. In this study, three genera of zooplankton were identified: Asplanchna, Trichocerca (rotifers), and Cyclops. Among the phytoplankton, the Cyanophyceae group was the most dominant, while the rotifers were the most dominant group of zooplankton.


Figure 4. Microscopic view of different types of plankton present in the three different treatments (a-k) at 10×0.25 magnification.
Figure 4. Microscopic view of different types of plankton present in the three different treatments (a-k) at 10×0.25 magnification.

Ekasari and Maryam (2012 popup link icon) reported that Bacillariophyceae and protozoa were the dominant groups in the biofloc system of Tilapia. Asaduzzaman et al. (2010 popup link icon) also reported that rotifers were the dominant group in the biofloc system of M. rosenbergii. The differences in the dominant group of plankton in the present study may be due to species differences or other factors.

4. Conclusions

This research has shown that the growth performance of freshwater prawns (M. rosenbergii) in a biofloc system is affected by stocking density. The main findings suggest that low stocking densities result in the best growth rates and survival rates for the prawns. These findings emphasize the importance of carefully managing stocking densities to optimize the productivity of biofloc systems. The application of these findings can assist aquaculture professionals in Bangladesh in improving prawn farming practices in biofloc systems, potentially leading to increased yields and sustainability. However, there is still a significant research gap in understanding the long-term effects of different stocking densities on prawn health and water quality parameters. Additionally, further research could explore the economic implications of adopting optimal stocking densities in commercial prawn farming operations.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the Rural Development Academy (RDA), Bogura, for their generous financial support. Their commitment to advancing aquaculture research is greatly appreciated.

Data availability statement

The first author can provide the data upon reasonable request.

Informed consent statement

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author contributions

MAA: Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing; MAK: Validation, supervision, writing—review and editing. All the authors critically reviewed the manuscript and agreed to submit a final version of the article.

References

Ahmed N, Demaine H and Muir JF, 2008. Freshwater prawn farming in Bangladesh: history, present status and future prospects. Aquaculture Research, 39(8): 806-819. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2008.01931.x

Ali MA, Khuraiba HM, Elsayed NE and Sharawy ZZ, 2020. The effect of different stocking densities of marine shrimp larvae Litopeneaus vannamei on water quality using biofloc technology. Egyptian Journal of Nutrition and Feeds, 23: 183-195. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejnf.2020.95845

Arana LAV, 2010. Qualidade da água em aquicultura: princípios e práticas. Ed. da UFSC.

Arnold SJ, Sellars MJ, Crocos PJ and Coman GJ, 2006. An evaluation of stocking density on the intensive production of juvenile brown tiger shrimp (Penaeus esculentus). Aquaculture, 256: 174-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.01.032

Asaduzzaman M, Rahman MM, Azim ME, Islam MA, Wahab MA, Verdegem MCJ and Verreth JAJ, 2010. Effects of C/N ratio and substrate addition on natural food communities in freshwater prawn monoculture ponds. Aquaculture, 306 (1-4): 127-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.05.035

Avnimelech Y, 1999. Carbon/nitrogen ratio as a control element in aquaculture systems. Aquaculture, 176 (3-4): 227-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00085-X

Azad KN and Azad KN, 2022. Current status and chronological development of fisheries and aquaculture in Bangladesh. Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research, 29(02): 2484-2496. https://doi.org/10.18801/jbar.290222.300

Azim ME and Little DC, 2008. The biofloc technology (BFT) in indoor tanks: water quality, biofloc composition, and growth and welfare of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture, 283 (1-4): 29-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.06.036

Ballester ELC, Marzarotto SA, Silva de Castro C, Frozza A, Pastore I and Abreu PC, 2017. Productive performance of juvenile freshwater prawns Macrobrachium rosenbergii in biofloc system. Aquaculture Research, 48 (9): 4748-4755. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13296

Barua P and Das J, 2018. Entrepreneurship Barriers to Freshwater Prawn Culture in South-Eastern Bangladesh. IUP Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 15(4): 26-45.

Begon M, Towsend CR and Harper JL, 2007. Ecologia: de indivíduos a populações. Porto Alegre: Artmed. 752 pp.

Bossier P and Ekasari J, 2017. Biofloc technology application in aquaculture to support sustainable development goals. Microbial Biotechnology, 10(5): 1012-1016. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12836

Crab R, Defoirdt T, Bossier P and Verstraete W, 2012. Biofloc technology in aquaculture: beneficial effects and future challenges. Aquaculture, 356: 351-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.04.046

David FS, Cohen FP and Valenti WC, 2015. Intensification of the giant river prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii hatchery production. Aquaculture Research, 47 (12): 3747-3752. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.12824

Ebeling JM, Timmons MB and Bisogni JJ, 2006. Engineering analysis of the stoichiometry of photoautotrophic, autotrophic, and heterotrophic removal of ammonia–nitrogen in aquaculture systems. Aquaculture, 257 (1-4): 346-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.03.019

Edler L and Elbrächter M, 2010. The Utermöhl method for quantitative phytoplankton analysis. Microscopic and molecular methods for quantitative phytoplankton analysis, 110: 13-20.

El-Sherif MS and Mervat AA, 2009. Effect of rearing systems (mono-and poly-culture) on the performance of freshwater prawn (M. rosenbergii) juveniles. Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 4(3): 117-128. https://doi.org/10.3923/jfas.2009.117.128

Emerenciano MGC, Martínez-Córdova LR, Martínez-Porchas M and Miranda-Baeza A, 2017. Biofloc technology (BFT): a tool for water quality management in aquaculture. Water Quality, 5: 92-109. https://doi.org/10.5772/66416

Ekasari J and Maryam S, 2012. Evaluation of biofloc technology application on water quality and production performance of red tilapia Oreochromis sp. cultured at different stocking densities. Hayati Journal of Biosciences, 19(2): 73-80. https://doi.org/10.4308/hjb.19.2.73

FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations), 2016. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. FAO, Rome, pp. 200.

Gunther DC, Brune DE and Gall GAE, 1981. Ammonia production and removal in a trout rearing facility. Transactions of the ASAE, 24(5): 1376-1380. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.34455

Huang HH, Liao HM, Lei YJ and Yang PH, 2022. Effects of different carbon sources on growth performance of Litopenaeus vannamei and water quality in the biofloc system in low salinity.  Aquaculture, 546: 737239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737239

Hwihy MH, Zeina A and El-Damhougy K, 2021. Influence of Biofloc technology on economic evaluation of culturing Oreochromis niloticus reared at different stocking densities and feeding rates. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 25: 737-748. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejabf.2021.149784

Irani M, Islami HR, Bahabadi MN and Shekarabi SPH, 2023. Production of Pacific white shrimp under different stocking density in a zero-water exchange biofloc system: Effects on water quality, zootechnical performance, and body composition. Aquacultural Engineering, 100: 102313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2022.102313

Khanjani MH and Sharifinia M, 2022. Biofloc technology with addition molasses as carbon sources applied to Litopenaeus vannamei juvenile production under the effects of different C/N ratios. Aquaculture International, 30: 383-397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-021-00803-5

Liu G, Zhu S, Liu D, Guo X and Ye Z, 2017. Effects of stocking density of the white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone) on immunities, antioxidant status, and resistance against Vibrio harveyi in a biofloc system. Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 67: 19-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2017.05.038

López‐Huerta JM, Vega‐Villasante F, Ponce‐Palafox JT, Badillo Zapata D, Martínez Cárdenas L and Flores Alencaster OA, 2021. Growth, production, and feeding efficiency of freshwater, Longarm River prawn Macrobrachium tenellum at different densities in nursery phase culture under intensive conditions. North American Journal of Aquaculture, 83(3): 192-202. https://doi.org/10.1002/naaq.10188

Marques HLDA, Lombardi JV, Mallasen M, de Barros HP and Boock MV, 2010. Stocking densities in cage rearing of Amazon River prawn (Macrobrachium amazonicum) during nursery phases. Aquaculture, 307(3-4): 201-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.07.035

Moraes-Valenti P, De Morais PA, de Lima Preto B and Valenti WC, 2010. Effect of density on population development in the Amazon River prawn Macrobrachium amazonicum. Aquatic Biology, 9(3): 291-301.

Mugwanya M, Dawood MA, Kimera F and Sewilam H, 2021. Biofloc systems for sustainable production of economically important aquatic species: A review. Sustainability, 13(13): 7255. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137255

Nath S and Haldar C, 2020. Effects of Stress among Shrimp Post-Larvae stocked at High Stocking Density in Nursery Culture System: A Review. International Journal of Current Microbiology Applied Science, 9(5): 2987-2996. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.905.354

Negrini C, Castro CSD, Bittencourt-Guimarães AT, Frozza A, Ortiz-Kracizy R and Cupertino-Ballester EL, 2017. Stocking density for freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii (Decapoda, Palaemonidae) in biofloc system. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research, 45(5): 891-899. https://doi.org/10.3856/vol45-issue5-fulltext-3

New MB, 2005. Freshwater prawn farming: global status, recent research and a glance at the future. Aquaculture Research, 36(3): 210-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2005.01237.x

Ogello EO, Outa NO, Obiero KO, Kyule DN and Munguti JM, 2021. The prospects of biofloc technology (BFT) for sustainable aquaculture development. Scientific African, 14: 01053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e01053

Paul P, Rahman A, Hossain MM, Islam S, Mondal S and Haq M, 2016. Effect of stocking density on the growth and production of freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii). International Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture Sciences, 6: 77-86.

Pérez-Rostro CI, Pérez-Fuentes JA and Hernández-Vergara MP, 2014. Biofloc, a technical alternative for culturing Malaysian prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Sustainable Aquaculture Techniques, 267-283. https://doi.org/10.5772/57501

Rahman MS, 1992. Water quality management in aquaculture. BRAC Prokashana, Dhaka, Bangladesh. pp. 84.

Ronald N, Gladys B and Gasper E, 2014. The effects of stocking density on the growth and survival of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fry at son fish farm. Uganda. Journal of Aquaculture Research and Development, 5(2): 222. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9546.1000222

Sampaio CM and Valenti WC, 1996. Growth curves for Macrobrachium rosenbergii in semi‐intensive culture in Brazil. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 27(3): 353-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.1996.tb00619.x

Thompson FL, Abreu PC and Wasielesky W, 2002. Importance of biofilm for water quality and nourishment in intensive shrimp culture. Aquaculture, 203(3-4): 263-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00642-1

Tidwell JH, 2012. Current status and prospects of farming the giant river prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii De Man 1879) in the United States. Aquaculture Research, 43(7): 1023-1028. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.03032.x

Wasielesky JrW, Atwood H, Stokes A and Browdy CL, 2006. Effect of natural production in a zero exchange suspended microbial floc based super-intensive culture system for white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture, 258(1-4): 396-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.04.030

CrossMark Update
CROSSMARK Color horizontal
Article Metrics

Table 2. Growth parameters in the three different treatment groups (means ± SD).

Parameters

T-1 (50)

T-2 (70)

T-3 (90)

F value

Significance

Initial weight (g)

0.93±0.03

0.92±0.02

0.95±0.03

Final   weight (g)

36.28± 8.57

29.10 ± 5.2

27.53±7.65

Weight gain (g)

35.35±8.54a

28.18±5.19a

26.58±7.61a

1.24

NS

SGR (%)

2.04 ±0.08a

1.94±0.06a

1.90±0.06a

3.36

NS

FCR

1.91±0.10a

1.96±0.20a

2.15±0.27a

1.13

NS

Survival (%)

74.00±9.57a

61.33±7.51b

51.67±3.06b

21.44

*

* In a row, values with dissimilar superscripts are significantly different (one-way ANOVA, Tukey test, P< 0.05)

Table 1. Observed water quality parameters during the experiment.

 

T-1 (50)

T-2 (70)

T-3 (90)

Temperature

30.12±2.12a

30.51±2.9a

30.03±1.78a

pH

7.33±0.16a

7.11±0.21a

7.04±0.12a

DO

7.02±0.43a

6.87±0.52a

6.71±0.21a

Total ammonia nitrogen (TAN)

0.9±0.03a

0.83±0.02a

0.89±0.03a

Nitrite (NO2)

0.36±0.03a

0.41±0.04a

0.42±0.03a

Alkalinity

68±21.33a

101.43±25.55b

154.11±34.67c

Hardness

62.11±11.21a

61.24±13.76a

66.45±10.78a

*Data are presented as the means±SDs. In a row, values with similar superscripts are not significantly different (one-way ANOVA, Tukey test, P< 0.05).

[stm-calc id="1576"]