For Editors

Role of the Editor-in-Chief (EIC)

Leadership and vision

The Editor-in-Chief serves as the guiding force behind the scientific journal, providing visionary leadership. Their role involves setting a clear editorial vision that aligns with the journal’s mission. Through effective leadership, the EIC shapes the editorial direction and cultivates an environment conducive to scholarly excellence.

Editorial oversight

Editorial oversight is a pivotal responsibility for the EIC, encompassing the management of the entire editorial process. This includes overseeing the peer-review system, making final decisions on manuscript acceptance or rejection, and ensuring the overall quality and integrity of published content.

Decision-making authority

The EIC holds the ultimate decision-making authority, determining the acceptance or rejection of manuscripts. This involves synthesizing feedback from peer reviewers and the editorial board and making decisions that uphold the journal’s editorial standards and scholarly integrity.

Editorial board management

The assembly and effective management of the editorial board fall within the EIC’s purview. This entails selecting experts across relevant fields, fostering collaboration, and leveraging the collective expertise to enhance the journal’s scholarly standing.

Policy development

Active involvement in policy development is crucial. The EIC contributes to the establishment and refinement of editorial policies, ensuring they align with ethical standards and best practices in scientific publishing.

Quality control

Maintaining the highest standards of quality in published content is paramount. The EIC oversees the peer-review process, ensuring rigorous evaluations for scientific rigor, accuracy, and relevance. Upholding quality control measures is fundamental to preserving the journal’s credibility.

Communication and outreach

The EIC serves as the journal’s representative to the scientific community. Engaging in communication and outreach activities, attending conferences, and collaborating with other journals enhance the journal’s visibility and impact.

Conflict resolution

In the event of conflicts or ethical concerns, the EIC leads to conflict resolution. This involves addressing disputes between authors and reviewers, ensuring fairness, and making decisions that prioritize the integrity of the journal.

Strategic planning

Strategic planning is integral to the EIC’s responsibilities. Collaborating with the editorial board and the publisher, the EIC develops and implements strategies aligned with the journal’s goals, considering factors like target audience, impact factor, and emerging trends.


Peer review oversight

The EIC ensures the effectiveness of the peer-review process. This involves selecting qualified reviewers, monitoring the timeliness of reviews, and making decisions based on comprehensive feedback.

Content selection

Content selection is a crucial responsibility. The EIC evaluates submitted manuscripts to ensure alignment with the journal’s scope, contributing meaningfully to scientific discourse and meeting publication standards.

Editorial collaborations

Collaboration with other journals, societies, and organizations is a responsibility that enhances the journal’s reach and impact. Building positive relationships externally contributes to the journal’s standing within the broader scientific community.

Author and reviewer engagement

The EIC fosters positive relationships with authors and reviewers, providing clear communication, constructive feedback, and support throughout the publication process.

Ethical oversight

Upholding ethical standards is a cornerstone of the EIC’s responsibilities. This involves ensuring adherence to ethical guidelines and taking decisive action in cases of ethical violations.

Work Ethics


The EIC upholds the highest standards of integrity, ensuring editorial decisions are impartial, transparent, and based solely on the scholarly merit of the work.


Transparent communication is fundamental. The EIC communicates openly with authors, reviewers, and the editorial board about policies, decisions, and relevant issues.


Ensuring fair and equitable treatment of all contributors is paramount. The EIC strives to eliminate bias, ensuring the peer-review process is conducted impartially.


The EIC maintains strict confidentiality regarding unpublished manuscripts and confidential information related to the editorial process, safeguarding the privacy of authors and reviewers.

Working Criteria

Scientific expertise

Possessing an in-depth knowledge of the subject matter covered by the journal is fundamental. The EIC stays abreast of current developments and emerging trends in the field.

Communication skills

Effective communication is crucial. The EIC articulates the journal’s vision, provides clear guidance to authors and reviewers, and engages in constructive dialogue with the scientific community.

Time management

Efficient time management is essential for handling editorial responsibilities, including timely decision-making, managing workflows, and meeting publication deadlines.


Avoiding conflicts of interest

The EIC diligently identifies and manages conflicts of interest, ensuring editorial decisions are objective and free from external influence.

Maintaining editorial independence

Upholding the journal’s editorial independence is non-negotiable. The EIC ensures decisions are based solely on the scholarly merit of the work, free from undue influence.

Respecting ethical guidelines

Adhering to ethical guidelines is a core principle. The EIC takes decisive action in cases of ethical violations, safeguarding the journal’s reputation and the trust of the scientific community.

Role of an Associate Editor

Leadership support and collaboration

Associate Editors provide essential support to the Editor-in-Chief, collaborating to implement and refine the journal’s editorial vision. They contribute insights, aid in decision-making, and ensure the overall cohesiveness of the publication.

Content evaluation and decision support

In the evaluation of submitted manuscripts, Associate Editors play a crucial role. They offer comprehensive assessments to the Editor-in-Chief, contributing valuable insights into scientific rigor, relevance, and adherence to ethical standards. Their input significantly influences the final editorial decisions.


Peer review coordination

Overseeing the peer-review process is a central responsibility. Associate Editors select appropriate reviewers, manage review timelines, and synthesize feedback. They play a pivotal role in ensuring the thoroughness and constructive nature of the review process, contributing to the journal’s overall quality.

Author and reviewer communication

Associate Editors actively engage with authors and reviewers. They communicate editorial decisions, provide constructive feedback to authors, and address queries from both parties. This engagement fosters positive relationships and ensures clarity throughout the publication process.

Manuscript management

Managing the workflow of submitted manuscripts is a key responsibility. Associate Editors ensure that manuscripts progress through the editorial process efficiently, from submission to decision, maintaining organized records and timelines.

Editorial decision making

Contributing to editorial decisions, Associate Editors provide recommendations based on their assessments and insights. Their role is integral to the collaborative decision-making process that determines manuscript acceptance, revision, or rejection.

Job Description

Associate Editors play a multifaceted role, balancing administrative tasks with scholarly contributions. Their job description encompasses coordinating peer reviews, providing valuable insights, and contributing to the overall editorial management of the journal.

Work Ethics

Integrity in decision-making

Associate Editors uphold the highest ethical standards in decision-making. Their evaluations and recommendations ensure fairness, impartiality, and adherence to ethical guidelines, contributing to the journal’s reputation for integrity.

Transparent communication

Transparent communication is paramount. Associate Editors communicate decisions openly, provide clear and constructive feedback, and ensure transparency in all interactions with authors, reviewers, and the editorial team.

Working Criteria

Scientific competence

Possessing strong scientific expertise is essential. Associate Editors leverage their knowledge to effectively evaluate manuscripts, contribute to decision-making, and engage meaningfully with the scholarly content of the journal.

Efficient collaboration

Efficient collaboration is a core working criterion. Associate Editors work closely with the editorial team, authors, and reviewers to ensure effective communication, timely execution of tasks, and a seamless editorial workflow.


Conflict resolution assistance

While involved in decision-making, Associate Editors assist in addressing conflicts of interest. Their role is to support fair and impartial resolution mechanisms, contributing to the ethical integrity of the journal.

Adherence to editorial policies

Associate Editors must strictly adhere to the journal’s editorial policies and guidelines. Ensuring consistency in applying these standards contributes to the journal’s credibility, reliability, and adherence to ethical publishing practices.

Role of an Executive Editor

Strategic leadership

The Executive Editor provides strategic leadership, shaping the overall direction and impact of the journal within the scientific community. They play a key role in defining and implementing the journal’s long-term vision and goals.

Operational oversight

Responsible for the operational aspects of the journal, the Executive Editor oversees day-to-day activities, ensuring efficiency, and coordinating efforts to meet publication targets.


Editorial team management

Managing the editorial team, the Executive Editor oversees recruitment, training, and performance evaluation. They foster a collaborative and dynamic team environment to achieve editorial excellence.

Journal development

Contributing to the development of the journal, the Executive Editor explores opportunities for growth, collaborates with stakeholders, and identifies strategies to enhance the journal’s visibility and impact.

Budget oversight

The Executive Editor is responsible for budget management, allocating resources judiciously to support editorial activities, maintain quality standards, and achieve strategic objectives.

Job Description

Content strategy

Developing and implementing content strategies, the Executive Editor ensures that the journal’s content aligns with its mission, covering relevant and cutting-edge research topics.

Partnership and collaboration

Building partnerships with academic institutions, research organizations, and industry, the Executive Editor fosters collaborations that elevate the journal’s profile and expand its reach.

Work Ethics

Integrity and transparency

Upholding the highest standards of integrity, the Executive Editor ensures transparent communication and decision-making processes, maintaining trust among authors, reviewers, and readers.

Impartial editorial oversight

Implementing impartial editorial oversight, the Executive Editor ensures that decisions regarding manuscript acceptance, revisions, or rejections are based solely on scholarly merit.

Working Criteria

Innovation and adaptability

Promoting innovation and adaptability, the Executive Editor stays abreast of industry trends, emerging technologies, and evolving publishing models to keep the journal at the forefront of scientific publishing.

Strategic planning

Engaging in strategic planning, the Executive Editor collaborates with the editorial team to set goals, define target audiences, and implement strategies that align with the journal’s overarching mission.


Conflict resolution

In situations of conflict or disputes, the Executive Editor takes a leadership role in resolution, ensuring fairness, and maintaining the journal’s reputation for ethical practices.

Ethical adherence

Adhering to ethical guidelines and industry standards is a non-negotiable boundary. The Executive Editor ensures that the journal operates ethically in all aspects of its editorial processes.

Role of a Managing Editor

Editorial leadership

The Managing Editor assumes a leadership role in overseeing the day-to-day operations of the journal, ensuring efficient workflow, and contributing to the overall editorial strategy.

Administrative oversight

Responsible for administrative aspects, the Managing Editor coordinates manuscript submissions, manages deadlines, and oversees the editorial calendar. They play a pivotal role in maintaining the journal’s organizational efficiency.


Manuscript management

Central to the role is the management of manuscripts. The Managing Editor oversees the submission and review process, ensuring timely communication with authors, reviewers, and editorial board members.

Collaboration with editors

Collaborating closely with Editors and Associate Editors, the Managing Editor facilitates seamless communication, addressing queries, and ensuring alignment with the journal’s editorial policies.

Quality control

Quality control is a priority. The Managing Editor ensures that manuscripts meet the journal’s standards, coordinating peer reviews, and contributing to decisions on acceptance, revision, or rejection.

Job Description

Workflow coordination

Managing the editorial workflow, the Managing Editor coordinates tasks such as peer review, revision, and final publication. They work to optimize efficiency and meet publication deadlines.

Editorial board support

Providing support to the Editorial Board, the Managing Editor assists in board communications, and meeting coordination, and facilitates collaboration between board members and authors.

Work Ethics

Transparency and communication

Maintaining transparent communication is fundamental. The Managing Editor communicates openly with authors, reviewers, and the editorial team, ensuring clarity and promoting a positive and collaborative environment.

Impartial decision implementation

Implementing editorial decisions impartially is a key ethical consideration. The Managing Editor ensures that decisions align with the journal’s policies and ethical standards.

Working Criteria

Organizational skills

Strong organizational skills are crucial. The Managing Editor manages multiple tasks simultaneously, tracking submissions, reviews, and revisions to ensure a smooth editorial process.

Deadline management

Efficiently managing deadlines is a core working criterion. The Managing Editor ensures that the publication timeline is adhered to, meeting deadlines for peer reviews, revisions, and final publication.



Maintaining strict confidentiality is a boundary. The Managing Editor ensures the confidentiality of unpublished manuscripts, reviewer identities, and sensitive editorial communications.

Ethical adherence

Adhering to ethical guidelines is non-negotiable. The Managing Editor plays a vital role in upholding ethical standards, and ensuring fair practices in manuscript handling, peer review, and author interactions.

Role of a Consulting Editor

Editorial strategy and direction

Consulting Editors play a pivotal role in shaping the editorial strategy and direction of the journal. They contribute strategic insights, offering guidance on content focus, scope refinement, and the overall positioning of the journal within the academic landscape.

Advisory and mentorship

Functioning as advisors and mentors, Consulting Editors provide guidance to the editorial team. They offer their expertise to junior editors, contributing to their professional development and fostering a collaborative and supportive editorial environment.


Manuscript review and evaluation

A significant responsibility is the review and evaluation of manuscripts. Consulting Editors contribute expert assessments, offering insights into the scientific validity, relevance, and potential impact of submitted work.

Strategic planning

Engaged in strategic planning, Consulting Editors contribute to long-term goals. They collaborate with the editorial team to identify emerging trends, target audiences, and innovative approaches that enhance the journal’s influence and standing in the scientific community.

Editorial board engagement

Interacting with the editorial board is crucial. Consulting Editors engage with board members, harnessing their collective expertise to inform editorial decisions and strengthen the journal’s overall scholarly impact.

Job Description

Content oversight

The primary focus of the job is to provide oversight of the journal’s content. Consulting Editors ensure that the published material aligns with the journal’s standards, maintaining a high level of scientific rigor and relevance.

Networking and collaboration

Actively engaging in networking and collaboration, Consulting Editors establish connections within the scientific community. They collaborate with authors, researchers, and institutions to enhance the journal’s visibility and foster collaborative opportunities.

Work Ethics

Impartial decision-making

Maintaining impartiality is a cornerstone of the Consulting Editor’s work ethic. They ensure that editorial decisions are based solely on scholarly merit, free from personal biases or external pressures.

Confidentiality and integrity

Upholding confidentiality and integrity is paramount. Consulting Editors treat all submitted manuscripts with the utmost confidentiality, and they adhere to ethical guidelines to preserve the integrity of the peer-review process.

Working Criteria

Global awareness

Having a global awareness of scientific developments is essential. Consulting Editors stay informed about research trends, innovations, and diverse perspectives to contribute meaningfully to the journal’s content and direction.

Timely and constructive feedback

Providing timely and constructive feedback is crucial. Consulting Editors offer valuable insights to authors and reviewers, ensuring that the feedback loop is efficient and contributes to the improvement of submitted manuscripts.


Avoiding conflicts of interest

Avoiding conflicts of interest is a critical boundary. Consulting Editors must disclose and manage any potential conflicts to maintain the integrity of the editorial process.

Ethical adherence

Strict adherence to ethical guidelines is non-negotiable. Consulting Editors ensure that ethical standards are upheld in manuscript review, author interactions, and all aspects of the editorial process.

Role of an Editor

Leadership and direction

Editors serve as the linchpin in steering the journal’s editorial course. They set a leadership tone, offering strategic insights that align with the publication’s objectives. This involves providing a clear editorial vision, guiding the journal toward academic prominence, and ensuring its sustained contribution to the scientific community.

Content curation

Editors act as gatekeepers, meticulously curating content to maintain the journal’s standards. They evaluate submissions for scientific rigor, originality, and alignment with the journal’s scope. Content curation involves balancing the diverse array of topics within the journal’s focus to create a cohesive and impactful body of work.


Peer review coordination

Editors orchestrate the peer-review process, from selecting suitable reviewers to synthesizing feedback for authors. Their decisions on manuscript acceptance or rejection are grounded in a comprehensive evaluation of the peer reviewers’ input, ensuring the integrity and quality of published content.

Author and reviewer engagement

Building and maintaining positive relationships with authors and reviewers are central responsibilities. Editors provide constructive feedback to authors, guiding them through the publication process. Engaging with reviewers involves acknowledging their contributions, addressing concerns, and fostering a collaborative and respectful environment.

Job description

Editors function as the nexus between scientific expertise and editorial stewardship. Their job description encompasses a blend of administrative tasks, such as manuscript management and coordination, with scholarly responsibilities, contributing actively to the scholarly advancement of the journal’s field.

Work Ethics


Editors are custodians of integrity, ensuring that decisions on manuscript acceptance or rejection are impartial and based solely on scholarly merit. They navigate potential conflicts with transparency and fairness, maintaining the trust of authors, reviewers, and readers.


Transparent communication is foundational. Editors communicate openly about editorial processes, decisions, and policies, fostering a culture of transparency that enhances the credibility of the journal.

Working criteria

Scientific expertise

Editors are required to possess a profound understanding of the journal’s field. Staying current with research trends, methodologies, and advancements ensures their ability to make informed decisions and contribute meaningfully to the scientific discourse.

Communication skills

Effective communication is a cornerstone of editorial success. Editors articulate expectations to authors, provide constructive feedback, and maintain open lines of communication with the editorial board, ensuring a collaborative and well-informed publishing process.


Avoiding conflicts of interest

Editors navigate potential conflicts of interest with diligence, ensuring that personal relationships, affiliations, or external pressures do not compromise editorial decisions. In cases of conflict, recusal is an ethical imperative.

Maintaining editorial independence

Upholding editorial independence is paramount. Editors make decisions based on scholarly merit, shielding the journal from external influences that could compromise its integrity or deviate from its mission.

Do you have any question? Ask us

    Two columns
    Preferred Editing Service Price Calculator
    Estimated Fee
    Name Total
    "{{getWooProductName}}" has been added to your cart
    Have a promocode?
    Promocode Hide Show